Eating at home or eating out?

I always prefer eating at home to eating out. And I think everybody should, too. If you ask why, just read what I'm going to write.
When we cook at home, it feels like a huge success to us, it makes us happy without reason. Because we are the one who cooked that meal! We feel proud of ourselves, right? Can you tell me, do you feel like this when you eat out? No.
When we cook at home, we know what ingredients are put in the meal and we try to use fresh vegetables, meats, better oil. But who can assure us that when we eat out, we are eating foods as healthy as ours? Nobody.
Some people who are in favour of the idea that eating out is better suggest that it is better because there must be a something different in our lives at some time. What I want to Tell them is this: Why are you looking for that change outside? Can't we just create our own change? We can call our friends, try new tastes, or make a special dinner for somebody else on by ourselves.. Isn't it enough? I thinkit is. :)

Banning websites for some reasons is meaningless because people may need those websites for some other reasons and it is useless as they always find a way to use them just like they use youtube and myspace.
Governments are banning certain websites in order to protest them for something or as they think those websites are harmful. But banning them has no point for most of the time, I think. Take youtube for example. It is forbidden in our country for political reasons -because there are some videos that are libellous to Atatürk- but banning it didn't make any difference, people kept uploading such videos and it is still available with little tricks in our country. All I'm trying to say is that by trying to make people unable to access some sites by force, making them be aware of the consequences of entering those websites would be more reasonable.

Downloading

Most people say that downloading music/movies from internet is their favourite activity, and it shouldn't be illegal, and I'm one of them.
Well, sharing is one of the things that are taught to us in the early times of our childhoods, right? When we download music or videos, doesn't it mean sharing what we have with the people who doesn't have opportunity to buy those things? So, what's wrong with it? The people that are against to the idea of free downloading say that it should be illegal as it is violation to the rights of the artists' and singers'. They say that by downloading, in a way, we are stealing the singers' and artists' money. But i don't think that it's correct. I mean are they really in need of that money? Can't they live without the money that they will have from a couple of downloadings? Or is it just that they can't live without the island or villa that they'll buy with that money?
In conclusion, I think downloading doesn't harm anyone and it is not a violation to any kind of rights. So it should be legal.